In the flow when you click yes to modifications, then yes to BHP and then enter your BHP, one could assume that they have properly declared this modification.
For example on one user, they declared the above and proceed to enter three other modifications, so their modifications list says 3, we declare the vehicle details as declared plus the three modifications and the carrier comes back saying uh oh - you are definitely missing a modification because the engine CC is bigger than the stock engine.
So likely what we need is a question that says does this vehicle have a non-standard enging - yes or no (likely below the BHP question) and ideally this auto populates the first modification as non-standard engine and then prompts them what else they need to fill in.
We’ve had several people think they have properly declared the non-standard engine because they enter the current CC and the current BHP. So this new step would prevent delays in progressing an application and frustration from the customer thinking they have declared things correctly.


Thanks Christen, a few things here.
1.) Disclosing that one of your modifications adjusts your bhp shouldn’t mean that you shouldn’t have to disclose the modifications.
2.) Non standard engine is just one of many mods which could adjust the BHP so I think it’d be really initiative given it’s more often than not going to be inaccurate. At a guess I’d imagine a chip remap or an intake / turbo would be the most common BHP change which would still be the same engine.
Perhaps (if non standard bhp is selected) we can just add a bit of text above where it says Modification 1 saying something like:
Please ensure you include all modifications below which contribute to your adjusted BHP
What do you think?
Yes that works - thanks!
